Les baguettes de lumière UV tuent les virus. Ils constituent également un “ problème majeur de sécurité ”, préviennent les experts

Gettyimages-566065231

Kirk McKoy / Los Angeles Times / Getty Images

Pour les actualités et informations les plus récentes sur la pandémie de coronavirus, visitez le site Web de l’OMS.

le pandémie de Coronavirus Les entreprises et les propriétaires recherchent tout ce qui pourrait rendre les espaces partagés plus sûrs et plus hygiéniques. Cela amène certains consommateurs et fabricants de produits à se tourner vers les ultraviolets ou les rayons UV comme solution potentielle – en particulier, un type de lumière UV appelé UVC, qui a des longueurs d’onde extra-courtes et suffisamment d’énergie pour modifier l’ADN et l’ARN des cellules organiques, ce qui les empêche de se reproduire.

La lumière UVC a une longue histoire en tant que désinfectant éprouvé dans des endroits comme les hôpitaux et les laboratoires, et les entreprises, y compris les compagnies aériennes, les hôtels et les espaces commerciaux, comptent sur la lumière invisible. plus que jamais en 2020. La pandémie a également produit un flot d’appareils bon marché et non réglementés destinés aux consommateurs à utiliser à la maison, y compris des baguettes UVC portables qui ressemblent à des sabres laser.

Les appareils comme ceux-ci ne sont pas nouveaux, mais la montée en flèche de l’intérêt qu’ils suscitent en raison de la pandémie sème l’alarme, car la lumière UVC est un cancérigène connu, et même quelques instants d’exposition directe peuvent être dangereux pour les yeux et la peau.

Maintenant, alors que la recherche sur les UVC et le coronavirus se poursuit, les régulateurs, les leaders de l’industrie et les professionnels des sciences de la sécurité exhortent à la prudence. Voici ce que vous devez savoir: la science, les risques pour la sécurité et tout ce que les experts disent que vous devriez prendre en compte avant d’introduire une source de lumière alimentée par UVC dans votre maison.


Now playing:
Watch this:

How this drone can help stop the spread of coronavirus



3:48

UVC’s time to shine?

Ultraviolet light is invisible electromagnetic radiation that falls between 180 and 400 nanometers in wavelength. UVC light is ultraviolet light that falls specifically between 180 and 280 nanometers — the shortest, most intense part of the ultraviolet light spectrum. Unlike less intense UVA and UVB light, which will burn your skin if you sit out in the sun too long, UVC light can burn skin within seconds. Natural UVC light from the sun is completely absorbed by the Earth’s atmosphere.

Man-made UVC light is just as intense, and just as good at ionizing organic molecules and altering their DNA and RNA. For years, scientists and medical professionals have used the invisible light as a natural disinfectant against bacteria and viruses, including the coronaviruses that cause illnesses like SARS and MERS. While scientists are still working to determine the full efficacy of UVC light against SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, the early indications are promising — enough so that the FDA issued guidance in March that it “does not plan to object” to any previously cleared sterilization or disinfectant devices updating their marketing to indicate that they combat COVID-19.

“Because disinfection kills most recognized pathogenic microorganisms, it can generally be inferred that sterilization and disinfection should minimize the viability of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces and in the air in confined spaces,” the FDA wrote. That gave manufacturers a green light to begin marketing potential COVID killers.

Now, interest in UVC light is surging. Signify, formerly Philips Lighting, which has been producing UVC lighting for more than 35 years, tells Crumpe that interest in the lights has spiked enough to justify an eight-fold increase in production since the start of the pandemic. In Kansas, Digital Aerolus developed a UVC drone that can fly through contaminated spaces disinfecting everything it comes across. Here in Kentucky, Big Ass Fans recently released a UVC ceiling fan designed to disinfect air as it circulates throughout the room.

Those are all high-end, commercial-grade products — but interest in cheaper, simpler UVC products that people can bring into their homes is on the rise, too. That’s where safety experts are beginning to sound the alarms.

UL’s reference guide for UVC devices notes the “serious risks” associated with UVC exposure.


Underwriters Laboratories

Unseen dangers

Run a quick search for “UVC” on Amazon or at Walmart and you’ll find page upon page of products that promise to sterilize your home. With names like “Germ Guardian,” “Bio Shield,” and “The Germ Reaper,” most claim to kill 99.9% of viruses and other pathogens they come into contact with.

“Under the pandemic, we’ve seen a great increase in the interest around UV germicidal-type devices, including those that are now more consumer-facing,” says Todd Straka, global industry director of lighting at Underwriters Laboratories, where UVC products are tested for safety certification. “These can be very dangerous if you don’t use them properly.”

Straka and other safety science experts at UL recently teamed with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association and the American Lighting Association to address these concerns in a two-page position paper (PDF) outlining the potential risks of using uncertified U-C devices. Straka calls the situation “a major safety issue,” and his counterparts at NEMA and the ALA agree.

“We know that UVC is a proven way to help eliminate dangerous bacteria and viruses in water, air and on surfaces,” says Karen Willis, NEMA’s industry director for lighting systems. “Nevertheless, in the midst of COVID-19, we are concerned about proliferation of UVC disinfecting devices being sold with uncertain safety features and incomplete operating instructions.”  

One potential source of risk is older, mercury-based UVC lamps. Lamps like those emit ozone that can be toxic to the lungs — but newer, UVC LED lamps are a potential hazard, as well. The biggest concern, UL’s experts say, are uncontained devices like light wands that could potentially expose a user’s eyes or skin to the invisible UVC light at close range, causing damage. UL is unwilling to certify wands like those due to the high risk in an uncontrolled home setting.

This UVC wand is sold by Walmart for $20. The listing makes no mention of the potential hazard UV light poses to eyes and skin.


Akaso Tech

“This is a hazard you can’t see,” explains Pamela Gwynn, principal engineer for UL’s Life and Health Sciences related to medical equipment. “They’re not toys. They’re not instantaneous. There has to be some time for the device to be in place for it to be able to do the work it’s intended to.

“The damage that’s being done is also not instantaneous,” Gwynn adds. “So it may take several days before you realize you’ve damaged your eyes or caused burns on your skin.”

Many of the products currently being sold seem to downplay that risk, or ignore it altogether. One of the sponsored products at the top of Amazon’s search ranks is a UVC light wand from a company headquartered in Shenzhen, China called 59S. The product features a child safety lock and an autoshutoff feature if the wand isn’t shining downward, but a misleading chart at the top of the product listing comparing the wand’s LEDs to other types of UV lamps wrongly claims that the light comes with no side effects. You have to scan the fine print in one of the product photos to find a warning about exposure to the eyes and skin — it isn’t printed anywhere else in the listing, though it does say you should wear protective goggles. And, as an observant Crumpe reader pointed out, Amazon has it categorized under “Hand Sanitizers.”

Another wand listed on Walmart features no child lock or autoshutoff at all, and the listing never warns of any hazard to the eyes or skin — though it does boast of lights that are twice as intense as a previous model. There’s no mention of safety certification other than 3C certification via Chinese regulators, either.

The manufacturer does make sure to specify that the wand is certified waterproof.

“Can be put in the fish tank,” the listing notes.

When asked about its policies towards listings like those, Walmart asked for specific examples but did not respond further once provided with them. Amazon didn’t respond to a request for comment, though its product listings note that the company assumes no liability for inaccuracies or misstatements about products.

uvc-edit2

Big Ass Fans expects final results by the end of August from lab-based trials exploring the efficacy of fan-mounted UVC lights against COVID-19.


Big Ass Fans

Caution light

In an age when Clorox wipes are a precious commodity, sanitizing UVC light might seem like a promising alternative. But experts urge caution for anyone tempted to bring the tech into their home.

“UL has made a conscious decision not to certify the consumer-facing, portable, handheld wand-type devices due to the inability to manage the risks,” Straka tells Crumpe. 

“What we would suggest is definitely looking at products that do have a safety certification from a nationally recognized testing laboratory, such as UL,” Straka adds. “There are installers and commercial-grade products out there that do have a safety certification and which can be installed and used very safely.”

In the meantime, research continues into the potential efficacy of UVC light against the virus that causes COVID-19. Some companies that sell UVC products, like Signify and Big Ass Fans, are putting those products to the test at third-party research labs to verify effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2. Researchers at Boston University found that Signify’s wall-mounted UVC lights killed up to 99% of the virus within seconds; the company is now broadening its portfolio of UVC luminaries for commercial environments. Similar tests for the Haiku UVC ceiling fan from Big Ass Fans are expected to produce final results by the end of August. 

Elsewhere, one recent study out of Columbia University looked at “far-UVC” light that shines at a less intense wavelength — still strong enough to zap viruses, but potentially incapable of penetrating eye and skin tissue.

Again, UL urges caution.

“At this point, though there are some promising studies, it’s not yet widely determined that [far-UVC light] est en effet sûr », dit Gwynn.« C’est toujours considéré comme UV, et il n’y a pas d’exception que [the far-UVC] la longueur d’onde n’est pas un problème. ”

«Il existe des études émergentes pour comprendre l’efficacité des UVC contre le COVID-19», ajoute Straka, «mais en termes de recherche, il reste encore beaucoup à faire à ce sujet. Je mettrais donc en garde les consommateurs … s’ils voient vraiment robuste des affirmations sur l’efficacité, pour garder à l’esprit que cela est encore très en cours. ”

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

*